Lucy has been waking up less frequently at night. She went from waking 4-5 times between 7pm and 7am, to waking just once around 2 am. Sometimes twice, depending on whether or not she decides to poop out three days worth of food around 5 am. This is a WONDERFUL development...but...
...I must say, one of these days I will miss snuggling with her in the quiet darkness of extremely early morning.
Last night, she work up at 2:15am, after sleeping for a solid 7 hours (!!). I stumbled half-asleep into her room (my sweet, slumbering husband barely stirring) and gathered her in my arms. We sat in the rocker and nursed. I took one little hand in mine, playing with her fingers, and her other hand was gently tickling my waist. Her fingers were so chilly I almost jumped when she touched my skin. She always goes for skin-to-skin contact during her night-time feedings. She'll reach up and put her hand on my face, or on my breast as we nurse, or wrap her sweet little fingers around my thumb. Sometimes her other hand will touch my waist or burrow deep up under my arm (I am shockingly ticklish - this is a hard one to deal with) - anywhere she can feel the warmth of Mama close by. It is a powerful joy I cannot even come close to describing, mostly because of it's complete and utter lack of "specialness".
So nothing special happened last night, except that I was nursing my long-desired, often dreamt-of, precious baby girl in the wee hours of the morning.
Perfect.
Wednesday, March 31, 2010
Monday, March 29, 2010
Breaks Over, Back to the Blog!
I have not blogged in almost 2 months. I have no excuse for this. Other than little-less-than-new-mama-exhaustion and a rather devasting lack of an extra set of hands. Actually, an extra brain would be even more helpful. I could fill the extra brain with all the stuff I need to remember that is a little less pressing than caring for the baby and remembering to go to work. Like remembering that I want ice cream sometimes after dinner, and that I have a blog that no one reads that I should update if I ever want anyone to read it. And that there are apple steaming on the stove and I should go remove them from the heat before they crystalize. You know, the less-than-important things.
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
Screamin' Demon
My little scootie toot has taken ALL DAY to not take a nap.
When I was pregnant with Lucy, I did not read a single parenting book. I thought "what if my baby doesn't do that?" It would just make me feel like a bad mom. And even worse mom if I couldn't get her to do all the things that the "experts" say should be happening. I didn't see the point in filling my head with idea of how things were supposed to go before I had even met her.
In the last month I have bought every single book out there on sleep. Well, okay, not every single one, but a fairly large sampling. I have Healthy Sleep Habits Happy Child by Marc Weissbluth (HSHHC), which tells me that if I don't get Lucy to sleep well 3 months ago, she will grow up to be an insomniac wth low brain performance. He also peppers his book with boxed reminders like NEVER WAKE A SLEEPING BABY, but then in the body of the text says things like "you may have to occasionally wake a baby to protect the sleep schedule" and listing naps of "limited duration" in his sleep schedule. The only way I know to limit the duration of a nap is to wake her up. Then to emphasize the point he just negated, he puts NEVER WAKE A SLEEPING BABY in another box labled IMPORTANT POINT. So which is it? He also makes overly-wordy non-points like this: "After 4months, naps of less than one hour cannot count as "real" naps. Sometimes a nap of 45 minutes may be all your child needs, but naps less than thirty minutes don't help." Why not just say "after 4 months, naps less than 30 minutes cannot be counted as "real" naps. Use less ink, make more sense. We're sleep deprived, here, Dr. Weissbluth, we don't have the mental capacity to unravel your circuitous ramblings. He also spends more than half of the rather thick book talking about clinical research and sleep studies. While interesting, this is also not information easily digested by those of us who have not had a good night's sleep since sometime in early September. I am not saying he doesn't have some good points or good advice (especially the importance of a regular schedule), but they are buried so deep in jargon that I have to wear waders to get at any of them. I won't even mention his section headers that make even less sense than some of his IMPORTANT POINTS. I admit, if I were getting a solid 8 or 9 uninterrupted hours of sleep every night, I might be able to get a better grasp on what he is saying. But then I wouldn't need his book, would I? I have read a total of 176 pages of his book and have yet to come across practical advice beyond "protect the sleep schedule". Even the sections entitled "Action Plan for Exhausted Parents" only have cryptic lists and references to other sections of the book.
I also have The No-Cry Sleep Solution by Elizabeth Pantley (TNCSS). This book appealed to me for its gentle approach to getting your child to sleep better at night. Her ideas seemed to make sense, but her book was mentioned by name in HSHHC (well, sort of, I assume there would be legal issues involved if it were ACTUALLY mentioned by name) as full of nonsense and "ridiculous" notions. She gives what seems to be really well-tested advice from an in-the-trenches breastfeeding, co-sleeping mom about getting your baby to sleep through the night without allowing her to cry it out (CIO), but all of it requires days and days (possibly months) of gradual changes. She says sleeping through the night requires either crying or time and she will choose time every time. Or something like that. And then at the end of the book she gives advice for using an attended CIO method if nothing else works, after spending the whole book saying that you shouldn't let your baby cry. Her book is great in many ways. The thing I like most is her acknowledgment that all babies are dfferent and will respond differently to varying methods. Hers is not a "one size fits all" solution. She provides a menu of methods and you choose the one you think will best fit your life and child. If I had the patience for all her sleep logs and sleep plan evaluation logs, I would probably be better at implementing a decent strategy from her book. As it is, however, I do not find myself able to make the effort. Laziness? Perhaps. Maybe I just don't think sleeping should require paperwork. Then again, maybe it does, because we're currently not doing either. I like the idea of TNCSS, but I lack the perserverence to follow through.
I also have The Secrets of the Baby Whisperer by Tracy Hogg (TSTBW). I haven't made it through the whole thing yet, but I am finding her advice to be generally sound and practical. I am thoroughly annoyed at her breastfeeding and bottle feeding advice. I am 100% in the "breast is best" category, but I am not a militant ant-formula mom. I think if you can, you should, and one shouldn't be made to feel guilty about the need to use formula. Thank goodness there is an adequate substitute for breast milk, or millions of babies all over the world would die. All that being said, I think that she underplays the importance of breastfeeding in the interest of not offending her formula-feeding clients. She calls breastfeeding a "feeding fashion":
So that bugs me about TSTBW. But her general advice about routines and sleep are practical and followable (unless, like me, you choose to feed on-cue). She offers great tips for figuring out wat your baby actually needs and has some very helpful charts on baby body language that I could have used when Lucy was just a little nugget. I haven't read the section on sleep yet (this was a general parenting book as opposed to a sleep-specific book), but I am hoping it provides me some ideas that don't require CIO. Or 4 months of gradual changes.
Also, Tracy, don't call me "ducky".
And finally, I have Solve Your Child's Sleep Problems by Richard Ferber. I haven't touched that one yet. I don't want to "ferberize" my little sweet potato. However, I read an interview with Dr. Ferber on how he felt about being to inextricably associated with the CIO (either the extinction or graduated extinction method of sleep training). He said his book was largely misunderstood (or not even read cover to cover) and that his book offers many other useful guidelines and strategies for, well, solving your child's sleep problems. He said that anyone who said they "used the Ferber method" hasn't read his book. I wouldn't know. I haven't read his book.
So at the end of the day (and all night long) a, I still find myself in the darkened nursery with a baby on my boob thinking "here we go again". It is harder and harder to detach the little sucubus when she has fallen asleep. Even if my boob literally falls out of her mouth, she will root around until she finds it before relaxing again. I play this game over and over, as many times a night as it takes. Sometimes that means twice - which I will take any night of the week. Sometimes it means five or six or more. I spend those hours in the rocking chair thinking about how to implement a new strategy. I rarely make any concrete plans, and if I do, they are immediately forgotten as my head hits the pillow. I think I have to come to terms with the fact that I have a laissez-faire approach to parenting, and that ther eis nothing wrong with that. Lucy is not going to head off to college with my boob in her mouth and she won't need to nurse to fall asleep when she's 10 years old. Or even three years old. So I am going to try to enjoy nursing my precious baby to sleep for now and deal with the conseqences later.
When I was pregnant with Lucy, I did not read a single parenting book. I thought "what if my baby doesn't do that?" It would just make me feel like a bad mom. And even worse mom if I couldn't get her to do all the things that the "experts" say should be happening. I didn't see the point in filling my head with idea of how things were supposed to go before I had even met her.
In the last month I have bought every single book out there on sleep. Well, okay, not every single one, but a fairly large sampling. I have Healthy Sleep Habits Happy Child by Marc Weissbluth (HSHHC), which tells me that if I don't get Lucy to sleep well 3 months ago, she will grow up to be an insomniac wth low brain performance. He also peppers his book with boxed reminders like NEVER WAKE A SLEEPING BABY, but then in the body of the text says things like "you may have to occasionally wake a baby to protect the sleep schedule" and listing naps of "limited duration" in his sleep schedule. The only way I know to limit the duration of a nap is to wake her up. Then to emphasize the point he just negated, he puts NEVER WAKE A SLEEPING BABY in another box labled IMPORTANT POINT. So which is it? He also makes overly-wordy non-points like this: "After 4months, naps of less than one hour cannot count as "real" naps. Sometimes a nap of 45 minutes may be all your child needs, but naps less than thirty minutes don't help." Why not just say "after 4 months, naps less than 30 minutes cannot be counted as "real" naps. Use less ink, make more sense. We're sleep deprived, here, Dr. Weissbluth, we don't have the mental capacity to unravel your circuitous ramblings. He also spends more than half of the rather thick book talking about clinical research and sleep studies. While interesting, this is also not information easily digested by those of us who have not had a good night's sleep since sometime in early September. I am not saying he doesn't have some good points or good advice (especially the importance of a regular schedule), but they are buried so deep in jargon that I have to wear waders to get at any of them. I won't even mention his section headers that make even less sense than some of his IMPORTANT POINTS. I admit, if I were getting a solid 8 or 9 uninterrupted hours of sleep every night, I might be able to get a better grasp on what he is saying. But then I wouldn't need his book, would I? I have read a total of 176 pages of his book and have yet to come across practical advice beyond "protect the sleep schedule". Even the sections entitled "Action Plan for Exhausted Parents" only have cryptic lists and references to other sections of the book.
I also have The No-Cry Sleep Solution by Elizabeth Pantley (TNCSS). This book appealed to me for its gentle approach to getting your child to sleep better at night. Her ideas seemed to make sense, but her book was mentioned by name in HSHHC (well, sort of, I assume there would be legal issues involved if it were ACTUALLY mentioned by name) as full of nonsense and "ridiculous" notions. She gives what seems to be really well-tested advice from an in-the-trenches breastfeeding, co-sleeping mom about getting your baby to sleep through the night without allowing her to cry it out (CIO), but all of it requires days and days (possibly months) of gradual changes. She says sleeping through the night requires either crying or time and she will choose time every time. Or something like that. And then at the end of the book she gives advice for using an attended CIO method if nothing else works, after spending the whole book saying that you shouldn't let your baby cry. Her book is great in many ways. The thing I like most is her acknowledgment that all babies are dfferent and will respond differently to varying methods. Hers is not a "one size fits all" solution. She provides a menu of methods and you choose the one you think will best fit your life and child. If I had the patience for all her sleep logs and sleep plan evaluation logs, I would probably be better at implementing a decent strategy from her book. As it is, however, I do not find myself able to make the effort. Laziness? Perhaps. Maybe I just don't think sleeping should require paperwork. Then again, maybe it does, because we're currently not doing either. I like the idea of TNCSS, but I lack the perserverence to follow through.
I also have The Secrets of the Baby Whisperer by Tracy Hogg (TSTBW). I haven't made it through the whole thing yet, but I am finding her advice to be generally sound and practical. I am thoroughly annoyed at her breastfeeding and bottle feeding advice. I am 100% in the "breast is best" category, but I am not a militant ant-formula mom. I think if you can, you should, and one shouldn't be made to feel guilty about the need to use formula. Thank goodness there is an adequate substitute for breast milk, or millions of babies all over the world would die. All that being said, I think that she underplays the importance of breastfeeding in the interest of not offending her formula-feeding clients. She calls breastfeeding a "feeding fashion":
Today, breastfeeding is all the rage. It doesn't mean formula is "bad". In the postwar decades, in fact, the majority believed that formula was best for babies and only a third of all mums nursed their babies. Currently, around 60% of mums breastfeed - although fewer than half of them are still nursing six months later. Who knows? As this book is being written, scientists are experiementing with the notion of genetically altering cows to produce human breast milk. If that happens peraps in the future everyone will tout cow's milk.
In fact, a 1999 article in the Journal of Nutrition suggests "that it may ultimately be possible to design formulas better able to meet the needs of individual infants than the milk available from the mother's breast".Ummmm...yeah. Because everyone LOVES genetically altered food, and what better thing to give your fragile newborn than experiemental cow-human milk hybrid. It's not like scientists have ever gotten anything wrong before, is it? And if they are going go through the trouble to genetically alter cows to produce human milk, why not just use human milk to begin with? I am all for better and better formulas for those who cannot (or choose not to) breastfeed for one reason or another, but ALL formula is based on breastmilk because it is the single best possible food for a baby. End of story. Millions of years of evolution have produced the current makeup of breastmilk, and try as they might, forumla makers have yet to get it 100% correct. She also implements a routine from day one, and is "never an advocate of on-demand feeding" (emphasis is the author's). I am not against a routine, but the idea of NOT feeding your baby when she is hungry seems as cruel an unresponsive as leaving a baby to CIO. Also, not feeding on cue can lead to issues in keeping up wth your supply. Now I do understand that as a clueless new mom, I often tried to feed my baby when she wasn't hungry, but, being the almost purely instinctual being that she was as a newborn, Lucy simply didn't eat if she wasn't hungry. Hogg also says that colic is caused by overfed babies. You cannot overfeed a breastfed baby. Every lactation consultant I ave ever spoken too has said those exact words to me. Babies are smarter than adults are. They won't over eat and they won't starve themselves. She also says not to let your baby simply suckle at the breast if she is not feeding and to give a pacifier instead. Um...a pacifier was designed to mimic...suckling at the breast...
So that bugs me about TSTBW. But her general advice about routines and sleep are practical and followable (unless, like me, you choose to feed on-cue). She offers great tips for figuring out wat your baby actually needs and has some very helpful charts on baby body language that I could have used when Lucy was just a little nugget. I haven't read the section on sleep yet (this was a general parenting book as opposed to a sleep-specific book), but I am hoping it provides me some ideas that don't require CIO. Or 4 months of gradual changes.
Also, Tracy, don't call me "ducky".
And finally, I have Solve Your Child's Sleep Problems by Richard Ferber. I haven't touched that one yet. I don't want to "ferberize" my little sweet potato. However, I read an interview with Dr. Ferber on how he felt about being to inextricably associated with the CIO (either the extinction or graduated extinction method of sleep training). He said his book was largely misunderstood (or not even read cover to cover) and that his book offers many other useful guidelines and strategies for, well, solving your child's sleep problems. He said that anyone who said they "used the Ferber method" hasn't read his book. I wouldn't know. I haven't read his book.
So at the end of the day (and all night long) a, I still find myself in the darkened nursery with a baby on my boob thinking "here we go again". It is harder and harder to detach the little sucubus when she has fallen asleep. Even if my boob literally falls out of her mouth, she will root around until she finds it before relaxing again. I play this game over and over, as many times a night as it takes. Sometimes that means twice - which I will take any night of the week. Sometimes it means five or six or more. I spend those hours in the rocking chair thinking about how to implement a new strategy. I rarely make any concrete plans, and if I do, they are immediately forgotten as my head hits the pillow. I think I have to come to terms with the fact that I have a laissez-faire approach to parenting, and that ther eis nothing wrong with that. Lucy is not going to head off to college with my boob in her mouth and she won't need to nurse to fall asleep when she's 10 years old. Or even three years old. So I am going to try to enjoy nursing my precious baby to sleep for now and deal with the conseqences later.
Saturday, February 6, 2010
Snow Musings
I admit to enjoying being snowed in. I also admit to being addicted to watching the updates Facebook. It is fun to see everyone hunkered down and keeping warm - completely isolated, but together nonetheless.
So am I going to unplug this weekend? Probably not. Way too important to know who's having oatmeal for breakfast tomorrow morning,
But I will take a walk through the snow...without my cell phone.
Relish the silence.
Wednesday, February 3, 2010
Chasing the Flower
Lucy's newest thing is viciously attacking this cute little flower on her jumperoo. She will stop at nothing to get that thing in her mouth and then jump with glee when it s finally where she wants it. It is very very cute:-) I looked at it today, because Lucy had this fluffy white stuff on her fingers. She had actually chewed through the stitching and was unstuffing the flower! Oops...I try not to compare her to an animal...but I have seen this behavior with my mother-in-law's dog Jazz...
Tuesday, February 2, 2010
Lucy's Awesome Hypnobabies Home Birth
I only wish I had some video of this.
Lucinda Belle was born at 1:01 am on Tuesday September 8th at home!
Giving birth was really the most amazing experience. There has been no time in my life where I have felt so utterly present in the moment. My body knew exactly what to do, I just had to relax and breathe and let it happen. It was incredible.
I found out I was pregnant a few days after Christmas in 2008. Because of my pelvic infection in 2005, I had to have a very early ultrasound to make sure the pregnancy wasn’t tubal. I knew I wanted to use a midwife, but I didn’t feel like I had time to research and interview midwives before finding out if the pregnancy was viable, so I started off at an OB practice recommended by my doctor. I liked the people I met there and they seemed to be a mother-friendly/baby-friendly practice (allowing mother-directed pushing, natural childbirth, intermittent fetal monitoring during labor, encouraged breastfeeding, etc.). However, each time I visited their practice, they sounded more and more like they intended to manage the delivery process in such a way as to limit my ability to allow my body to do its own thing in its own time. So we started looking around for a midwife.
I initially intended to give birth at a birth center, since our insurance would only cover midwifery services if it was provided at an accredited birthing center. However, there are only 3 birth centers in the area, and all of them were at least 45 minutes away without traffic. I wanted a midwife, but I had no desire to have a baby on the side of I-95 or on the Wilson Bridge in rush hour traffic (though that would have made for a very exciting story). And to top it all off, the nearest center didn’t even take our insurance!
I was feeling a little disappointed, thinking we would have to stick with a hospital birth. It just didn’t feel right. Having a baby didn’t seem like it should be a medical event if it didn’t have to be. And my husband Kevin and I both hate hospitals. That was when my sister KB sent me a book called Baby Catcher: Chronicles of a Modern Midwife about a home birth midwife. I devoured the book in a matter of hours and was utterly enthralled with the idea of a home birth. It was something I had never even considered, but it seemed so completely right that Kevin and I decided to make it happen. We found Erin and Mairi on a natural childbirth forum and we never looked back. I felt like I was being cared for in a way I have never felt with any doctor – like I was a part of their family. It was a wonderful experience.
I started having the first “real” pressure waves around in the evening of Saturday September 5th. I was hopeful, but not really thinking this would be it. And of course, it wasn’t. I tried to go to sleep that night, but the pressure waves were about 6-7 minutes apart and consistently lasted 90 seconds or more, so it was very hard to sleep for 5 minutes at a stretch. I called Mairi around 2 am to check in and let her know what was happening and she advised me to try to get some sleep (of course), take a warm bath and check in again in the morning. We filled the birth pool and I sat in that for a while, and it spaced out the waves to where I thought I might be able to get some sleep…but I was pretty much up all night.
At around 4 am I couldn’t sleep anymore and got into the tub, which, of course, slowed things down considerably. The waves were still very strong and long, just not coming at regular intervals. I sang my way through over an hour of contractions – for some reason singing felt better than moaning or doing any special breathing. I was having heavy pressure in my back so Erin checked me and said the baby’s body was in the right position, but her head was tilted up so it wasn’t pressing on my cervix effectively. I was still only 6 cm dilated after more than 36 hours. We walked the stairs and shook my hips for 30 minutes with no changes. Erin left around 3 pm and her birth assistant Susan took her place for a while. We paced the house and walked up and down the stairs for an hour. This sped things up while I was walking, but as soon as I sat down to rest, they slowed way down again.
Kevin was getting pretty worried about me at this point. It had been about 40 hours since the first pressure waves started; I had barely slept and seemed to be making little progress. Kevin wanted to go to the hospital, but I knew that I was too tired to deal with any chemical augmentation of labor and would probably end up with more interventions than I wanted. We decided once again that I would try to rest, so Kevin and I sent Susan home, I had a glass of wine, slept for 90 minutes (no psychedelic pressure waves this time) and I woke up around 6:30 in transition (Thank goodness!). The waves were finally coming regularly and strongly and not stopping or spacing out! They felt completely different from the warm-up, but the only transition “symptom” I felt was an increase in the feeling of energy flowing through me and uncontrollable shaking. The waves were very close together, and very intense but I was still able to stay relatively calm as long as I could move or sing through them.
Kevin called Mairi (our second midwife). I had been feeling pretty pushy for a while and remember sort of moaning “WHERE’S MAIRI??” My dad had been struggling for an hour to get the tub hot again and I was worried that I wouldn’t be able to birth in the water. When Mairi arrived around 7:30 pm on Monday night, she checked me and I was 9 cm dilated and fully effaced, so they had a little time to get the tub hot for me. I got in the water about 10:00 pm when my water finally broke. I started pushing around 11:30 pm. Time sort of suspended for a while there. I didn’t have to do anything or think about anything – just let my body do its work. I just relaxed, breathed and allowed the energy to move. It was nice and dark – the only light came from the candle and a red lamp, so the room was very comfortable and safe feeling. My dad had my sisters Karyn and Lynette on speaker phone so they were listening in – the next best thing to having them actually there at the birth, I guess.
I had my baby girl in my arms at 1:01 am on Tuesday September 8th. She opened her eyes immediately and looked around at everyone in the room for a full minute before she started to cry. It was so incredible! I thought I would recognize her – after all, she was so close to me for so long – but she really seemed like a little stranger in my arms. It wasn’t what I expected at all. I think I was more in awe of the fact that there was a BABY in there this whole time! The water in the tub was pretty high, so I got out of the tub to keep Lucy’s face out of the water. I birthed the placenta on the bed about 15 minutes later. Kevin cut the cord and we just stared at her for the longest time…before we realized that no one had even checked to see if she actually WAS a girl! She is so incredibly beautiful and we love her so much I can hardly stand it. We saved the placenta and are going to bury under a tree in the spring.
Saturday, January 30, 2010
Fighting the Sleep Wars
My four month old is currently practicing her opera impression in the next room. She's not crying, per se, just warbling. She is supposed to be sleeping, and was very nearly there. I put her down, tiptoed out and closed the door...2 minutes later the serendade began.
To say we are having sleep issues is sort of misleading. Most of the time (tonight's performance notwithstanding) she goes to sleep great! Like a dream! It is the staying asleep where we run into issues. She wakes up 2, 3, 4, 10 times a night sometimes. I can deal with 2 times a night. She's not even five months old yet. I can't make it though the night without a snack sometimes, and believe me when I tell you my stomach gets filled on a regular basis. I could even manage three times a night. But when she is up every 90 minutes, every 45 minutes, every 20 minutes...I start to contemplate why I wanted kids so bad in the first place.
In an effort to not a) spend all my waking hours (waaaaaaaay too many of them) crying, b) run away, and/or c) sell my darling angel on the black market for a tidy little profit , I swear I have purchased every book available about sleep. I have noticed two through lines these books (all of which present conflicting "methods", "ideas" and "techniques"). The first is that all sleep experts find the work of all other sleep experts to be misinformed, cruel, ignorant or ineffective. Or all of the above. The second is that you should always put your baby down "drowsy, but awake" and she will just drift off easily and sweetly.
Uh huh.
They have not met my sweet little PITA Bread. The instant she senses crib-ward movement, the legs start kicking, the arms start flailing, the lungs start wailing. So I pick her back up and start over. And over. And over. And when she is finally sleeping peacefully in her crib, I stumble back to bed, and lie awake, hearing the seconds ticking away, knowing that it is only a matter of time (oh, such a short, teasing amount of time) until she wakes up again and we start the whole ridiculous dance all over again.
Now, I am sure there is a mom out there who can put her baby down in her crib "drowsy but awake", kiss her goodnight, leave the room and know that Junior will drift off happily. But I am not sure I want to meet her.
Now, if you will excuse me, my lovely little girl fell asleep 20 minutes ago, and it is about time for her to wake up and yell at me again.
To say we are having sleep issues is sort of misleading. Most of the time (tonight's performance notwithstanding) she goes to sleep great! Like a dream! It is the staying asleep where we run into issues. She wakes up 2, 3, 4, 10 times a night sometimes. I can deal with 2 times a night. She's not even five months old yet. I can't make it though the night without a snack sometimes, and believe me when I tell you my stomach gets filled on a regular basis. I could even manage three times a night. But when she is up every 90 minutes, every 45 minutes, every 20 minutes...I start to contemplate why I wanted kids so bad in the first place.
In an effort to not a) spend all my waking hours (waaaaaaaay too many of them) crying, b) run away, and/or c) sell my darling angel on the black market for a tidy little profit , I swear I have purchased every book available about sleep. I have noticed two through lines these books (all of which present conflicting "methods", "ideas" and "techniques"). The first is that all sleep experts find the work of all other sleep experts to be misinformed, cruel, ignorant or ineffective. Or all of the above. The second is that you should always put your baby down "drowsy, but awake" and she will just drift off easily and sweetly.
Uh huh.
They have not met my sweet little PITA Bread. The instant she senses crib-ward movement, the legs start kicking, the arms start flailing, the lungs start wailing. So I pick her back up and start over. And over. And over. And when she is finally sleeping peacefully in her crib, I stumble back to bed, and lie awake, hearing the seconds ticking away, knowing that it is only a matter of time (oh, such a short, teasing amount of time) until she wakes up again and we start the whole ridiculous dance all over again.
Now, I am sure there is a mom out there who can put her baby down in her crib "drowsy but awake", kiss her goodnight, leave the room and know that Junior will drift off happily. But I am not sure I want to meet her.
Now, if you will excuse me, my lovely little girl fell asleep 20 minutes ago, and it is about time for her to wake up and yell at me again.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)